Thursday, April 24, 2014
Virginia Beach DUI Lawyers Driving Influence
Virginia Beach
DUI Lawyers
Below is a sample case of
traffic violation in Virginia as interpreted by a lawyer in our firm.
Have you been charged with a
traffic ticket in Virginia and need a lawyer to defend you?
Are you concerned about the
consequences of being charged for a traffic violation in Virginia?
We have defended many traffic
tickets in Virginia and we can help you as well.
We have client meeting
locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach
Fredericksburg Lynchburg
Contact our law firm today to
speak with a lawyer today about your traffic violation. An attorney from our firm will do his best to
help you.
Our law firm has the
necessary experience to assist you with this matter. We will do our absolute best to help you get
the best result possible based on the facts of your case.
Thomson v. Commonwealth
Facts:
Defendant was charged on a
warrant with driving under the influence (DUI). The Commonwealth's motion to
nolle prosse the charge so a direct indictment could be brought was granted.
Prior to trial on the indictment, defendant filed a motion in limine asking the
court to dismiss the charge. The motion was denied. Following a bench trial,
the Circuit Court of Virginia Beach convicted defendant of driving under the
influence. Defendant appealed.
If you are facing a traffic case in Virginia, contact a
SRIS Law Group lawyer for help. You can
reach us at 888-437-7747
Holdings:
The
Virginia Court made the following holding:
- To obtain a conviction
for driving under the influence pursuant to Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-266(i),
the Commonwealth must prove that the accused was operating a motor vehicle
with a blood alcohol content of 0.08% or higher. Thus, the ultimate fact
that the Commonwealth must prove is the alcohol content at the time of the
driving. The statutory language of § 18.2-266(i) provides the basis for a
presumption that the blood alcohol concentration while driving was the
same as indicated by the results of the subsequent test. Unless rebutted,
however, the test results are sufficient to establish the blood alcohol
concentration at the time of driving.
- The Due Process Clause
does not prohibit the use of a permissive inference as a procedural device
that shifts to a defendant the burden of producing some evidence
contesting a fact that may otherwise be inferred, provided that the
prosecution retains the ultimate burden of proof beyond a reasonable
doubt.
We have client meeting
locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach
Fredericksburg Lynchburg
Contact our law firm today to
speak with a lawyer today about your traffic ticket. An attorney from our firm will do his best to
help you.
Our law firm has the
necessary experience to assist you with this matter. We will do our absolute best to help you get
the best result possible based on the facts of your case.
Disclaimer:
Our Phone #
Popular Posts
-
Virginia Beach DUI Lawyers Below is a sample case of traffic violation in Virginia as interpreted by a lawyer in our firm. Have you...
-
Virginia Beach DUI Lawyers Search Arrest Below is a sample case of traffic violation in Virginia as interpreted by a lawyer in our firm...
-
Virginia Beach DUI Lawyers Below is a sample case of traffic violation in Virginia as interpreted by a lawyer in our firm. Have you...
-
Virginia Beach DUI Lawyers Below is a sample case of traffic violation in Virginia as interpreted by a lawyer in our firm. Have you...
-
Virginia Beach DUI Lawyers Below is a sample case of traffic violation in Virginia as interpreted by a lawyer in our firm. Have you...
Powered by Blogger.