Friday, April 25, 2014
Virginia Beach DUI Lawyers Violation Code 18.2-266
Virginia Beach
DUI Lawyers
Below is a sample case of
traffic violation in Virginia as interpreted by a lawyer in our firm.
Have you been charged with a
traffic ticket in Virginia and need a lawyer to defend you?
Are you concerned about the
consequences of being charged for a traffic violation in Virginia?
We have defended many traffic
tickets in Virginia and we can help you as well.
We have client meeting
locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach
Fredericksburg Lynchburg
Contact our law firm today to
speak with a lawyer today about your traffic violation. An attorney from our firm will do his best to
help you.
Our law firm has the
necessary experience to assist you with this matter. We will do our absolute best to help you get
the best result possible based on the facts of your case.
Evans v. Commonwealth
Facts:
Following the denial of
defendant's motions to strike the evidence, the Circuit Court of Virginia Beach
(Virginia) convicted defendant of driving under the influence (DUI), in
violation of Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-266. Defendant appealed.
If you are facing a traffic case in Virginia, contact a
SRIS Law Group lawyer for help. You can
reach us at 888-437-7747
Holdings:
The
Virginia Court made the following holding:
- A trial court is
entitled to rely on circumstantial evidence in its determination of an
appellant's guilt. Circumstantial evidence is as competent and is entitled
to as much weight as direct evidence, provided it is sufficiently
convincing to exclude every reasonable hypothesis except that of guilt.
Where the Commonwealth's evidence as to an element of an offense is wholly
circumstantial, all necessary circumstances proved must be consistent with
guilt and inconsistent with innocence and exclude every reasonable
hypothesis of innocence. However, the Commonwealth is not required to
disprove every remote possibility of innocence, but is, instead, required
only to establish guilt of the accused to the exclusion of a reasonable
doubt. The hypotheses which the prosecution must reasonably exclude are
those which flow from the evidence itself, and not from the imagination of
defendant's counsel.
- The credibility of the
witnesses and the weight accorded the evidence are matters solely for the
fact finder who has the opportunity to see and hear that evidence as it is
presented.
We have client meeting
locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach
Fredericksburg Lynchburg
Contact our law firm today to
speak with a lawyer today about your traffic ticket. An attorney from our firm will do his best to
help you.
Our law firm has the
necessary experience to assist you with this matter. We will do our absolute best to help you get
the best result possible based on the facts of your case.
Disclaimer:
Our Phone #
Popular Posts
-
Virginia Beach DUI Lawyers Below is a sample case of traffic violation in Virginia as interpreted by a lawyer in our firm. Have you...
-
Virginia Beach DUI Lawyers Search Arrest Below is a sample case of traffic violation in Virginia as interpreted by a lawyer in our firm...
-
Virginia Beach DUI Lawyers Below is a sample case of traffic violation in Virginia as interpreted by a lawyer in our firm. Have you...
-
Virginia Beach DUI Lawyers Below is a sample case of traffic violation in Virginia as interpreted by a lawyer in our firm. Have you...
-
Virginia Beach DUI Lawyers Below is a sample case of traffic violation in Virginia as interpreted by a lawyer in our firm. Have you...
Powered by Blogger.